It's somewhat uncomfortable to admit, but I'll say it. Five novels sit by my bed, every one incompletely consumed. Within my phone, I'm partway through over three dozen audiobooks, which looks minor alongside the forty-six Kindle titles I've set aside on my Kindle. That does not count the increasing stack of advance editions near my coffee table, striving for endorsements, now that I work as a published author in my own right.
On the surface, these figures might look to confirm recently expressed comments about current attention spans. A writer commented recently how effortless it is to distract a individual's focus when it is divided by social media and the 24-hour news. They suggested: “It could be as readers' attention spans shift the literature will have to change with them.” But as a person who previously would persistently get through whatever novel I started, I now view it a human right to set aside a book that I'm not enjoying.
I do not feel that this tendency is due to a short attention span – rather more it stems from the sense of time slipping through my fingers. I've always been struck by the monastic maxim: “Hold death every day in mind.” A different idea that we each have a mere limited time on this planet was as shocking to me as to others. However at what different time in human history have we ever had such instant entry to so many incredible masterpieces, whenever we choose? A surplus of treasures meets me in every library and on any screen, and I want to be intentional about where I focus my time. Could “DNF-ing” a novel (abbreviation in the book world for Unfinished) be not just a sign of a poor mind, but a thoughtful one?
Notably at a time when the industry (and therefore, commissioning) is still dominated by a particular demographic and its issues. Even though reading about characters unlike our own lives can help to strengthen the muscle for empathy, we furthermore read to reflect on our personal journeys and position in the world. Unless the books on the displays more fully reflect the backgrounds, realities and concerns of potential audiences, it might be very challenging to keep their interest.
Naturally, some novelists are indeed successfully crafting for the “modern attention span”: the concise writing of selected current works, the focused fragments of additional writers, and the quick sections of various modern stories are all a excellent demonstration for a shorter style and technique. And there is an abundance of writing guidance aimed at grabbing a audience: refine that first sentence, improve that opening chapter, increase the stakes (further! more!) and, if creating mystery, introduce a mystery on the beginning. This guidance is all sound – a potential publisher, house or buyer will use only a a handful of limited minutes deciding whether or not to continue. There is little reason in being difficult, like the writer on a writing course I participated in who, when confronted about the plot of their book, stated that “it all becomes clear about 75% of the way through”. No writer should force their audience through a sequence of challenges in order to be understood.
And I certainly create to be understood, as to the extent as that is achievable. At times that requires guiding the reader's hand, guiding them through the story point by succinct beat. Sometimes, I've discovered, insight takes perseverance – and I must allow me (along with other writers) the grace of wandering, of adding depth, of deviating, until I hit upon something meaningful. An influential writer makes the case for the novel discovering fresh structures and that, instead of the conventional narrative arc, “other patterns might assist us imagine novel ways to make our stories alive and true, persist in creating our works fresh”.
From that perspective, each opinions converge – the novel may have to evolve to suit the contemporary audience, as it has constantly achieved since it first emerged in the historical period (as we know it today). Maybe, like earlier novelists, coming authors will revert to publishing incrementally their books in newspapers. The upcoming those authors may currently be publishing their content, section by section, on digital services including those used by millions of frequent visitors. Genres shift with the times and we should permit them.
But do not say that any changes are all because of shorter attention spans. Were that true, brief fiction collections and micro tales would be viewed much more {commercial|profitable|marketable